The Remix Society

I’ve been talking to a lot of teachers lately about copyright, Creative Commons and how we might deal with the issues that arise when we want to use other peoples’ images and media and remix them into something new and creative. The restrictive thinking of traditional copyright has become an anachronism in the digital age. It just doesn’t serve us well any more.

The example I’ve been citing is the one I heard Larry Lessig mention, and that’s the story of how when land owners were once given title to their land, the title of ownership used to be phrased in language that essentially said they owned not only the parcel of land, but all the ground below it to the center of the earth and all the sky above it to the heavens. It was a nice romantic concept, this idea that you owned not just the surface of the land but the infinite column of space that extended above it.

Well, it was a nice romantic concept until the airplane was invented, that is. As more aircraft started to appear in our skies a number of greedy land owners started to make demands for payment to allow these aircraft to pass through “their” space, which they technically owned. The point is that the original land titles which gave them ownership of this space above their land were drafted in a time when the idea of travelling through the space was unimaginable. It was simply not a problem that anybody envisioned and so the laws were written in a way that did not take account of the possibility. As aircraft took to the skies, the laws had to be changed to allow for it… for to not adapt the old, outdated laws would have completely stifled the development of flight. Put simply, the old laws no longer made sense – the airplane caused a complete rethink of how these laws should work.

It easy to see the parallels with copyright law in the digital age. Many of our copyright laws were written in a time when the implications of the digital age were equally unimaginable. Copyright law is not written with the notion that creative works could be infinitely reproducible and easily mashed together to form new creative works, and that digital convergence allows all media types to be easily brought together and combined, edited and remixed in new ways. Copyright law was written in a time that never imagined that the price and power of computing devices would drop to the point that they could be used to make artwork, create music, edit movies and build media that would have required highly specialised equipment and thousands of dollars only a few short years ago, so that the barrier to entry is such that anyone who wants to create can produce professional looking work with limited resources. Finally, consider that not only has the cost of making media dropped to virtually nothing, but the cost of distribution of that media has also dropped to almost nothing… consider that a creative kid sitting in their bedroom can now use a computer and their own creativity to make a video and distribute it to a global audience of millions at essentially no cost. This is not the world that copyright was written for.

Creativity has always been built on the work of others. Our great artists, musicians and film makers have always stood on the shoulders of the giants that came before them, building on their ideas and extending them into new areas. Very little creative work comes from a foundation of nothing… it nearly always uses, references or extends upon the work of others. Manet influenced Monet, who influenced Renoir, who influenced Gauguin, who influenced Picasso, who influenced Duchamp, and so on. Some of the greatest creative minds in history were great because they built on the ideas of those who came before them, adding to them and creating yet more new ideas because of it.  We have always been a remix society.

I have no idea what the long term answer is to all this but I do know that we need to find one. Creative Commons goes some way towards providing a balance between protecting the intellectual property rights of the creator and allowing some reasonable use of their work for remixing and recreating. It provides some common sense to an area where it often seems to be lacking.

This video is a great example of what can be done when someone wants to be creative with the work of someone else… the song, Again and Again by The Bird and The Bee, is borrowed to provide a soundtrack for an amazing piece of visual work that is creative in it’s own right.  Created with nothing more than a Macintosh computer and an amazing degree of creativity, the video has been viewed nearly a million times on YouTube.

CC BY-SA 4.0 The Remix Society by Chris Betcher is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

5 Replies to “The Remix Society”

  1. Hey Chris,

    Interesting post. I must say, the question I pose to kids is….since when was music ever free??
    I can vividly recall my first LP..Dire Straight’s ‘Brothers in Arms’. It took me a month to save up for it. Having been in a band, and forked out some of my hard earned for some ‘studio time’ , should there not be financial remuneration for those who have spent money to create a project?? The flip side is bands like ‘The Nine Inch Nails’ realise that current marketing models/copyright models do not work and have made their recent albumn available to be downloaded and ‘mashed up’.
    That’s my two cents worth anyway

  2. Hi Chris,

    Great post! I agree with all that you have said. We are holding kids and teachers back. I know myself that even the time that it takes me to acknowledge the media I use in presentations and postings is time consuming and can be the straw that does it for the busy teacher trying to use ICT in classes.
    On the other side, Chris Morris above has a point.
    Like a lot of things, I think we are in a transitional period and I think that like you and I, most people with something to contribute will be happy to share them gratis.
    The thing that we all have to get our heads around is, if we give away what we produce, how do we derive income to live of?
    Something I struggle with daily!

    Cheers

    Paul

  3. Hi Chris

    I don’t think the copyright laws (although outdated) are holding creativity back. The laws are there to protect the rights of authors that wish to be protected. Authors that release works under creative commons are assisting in the creativity continuing into the future.

    There is plenty of images, videos and music available under the various CC licenses.

    The easiest way to avoid copyright issues is to use media that is outside the scope of protection.

    As for the creativity, shouldn’t educators be encouraging the kids to create their own music using say Audacity, Mixcraft or Garageband and all the freely available loops and sounds that are available.

  4. This is such an interesting issue and one that clearly we are all grappling with in our schools. Especially those who are encouraging students to create as well as consume.
    I agree with Darren. There is plenty of material out there that is CC licensed. A study of CC and copyright licenses is an ideal way to engender discussion around what is and should be protected and what and should be shared. It is after all up to the creator I guess. But as Chris says then it starts to get messy when you begin to mash many ideas and creations into another idea or creation.
    It is clearly something we have been and will be grappling with from now on.

That's all well and good, but what do YOU think?