The Challenge of being a Lifelong Learner

My Linda sent me an email today with a wonderful quote from Eric Hoffer about the nature of learning…

“In times of change, learners inherit the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists.”

It’s so true. As educators we talk a lot about the importance of being a lifelong learner, but to actually BE a lifelong learner is sometimes tough. It means accepting that what you don’t know far outweighs what you do know; it requires the mental muscle to always be curious and asking questions about the world and how it works; and it means being mature enough to regularly put your ego aside and freely admit that you really don’t know the answer to most things. Funnily enough, the group of people that I often see struggling with this idea more than most are teachers. We seem to espouse the lifelong learning ideal, but many of us still like to always be in control and feel like we at the top of the food chain when it comes to the learning process. It’s an interesting paradox.

Seymour Papert once wrote,

“So the model that says learn while you’re at school, while you’re young, the skills that you will apply during your lifetime is no longer tenable. The skills that you can learn when you’re at school will not be applicable. They will be obsolete by the time you get into the workplace and need them, except for one skill. The one really competitive skill is the skill of being able to learn. It is the skill of being able not to give the right answer to questions about what you were taught in school, but to make the right response to situations that are outside the scope of what you were taught in school. We need to produce people who know how to act when they’re faced with situations for which they were not specifically prepared.”

I came across that quote from Papert about 10 years ago, and as a teacher it changed everything for me. I suddenly “got it”. It crystallised exactly what the role of education should be, and how the industrial age classroom where we learnt facts in order to regurgitate them on a test, would never be able to meet the real needs of 21st Century learners who live in a world where many of the jobs we are supposedly preparing them for after school have not even been conceived of yet.

Being a lifelong learner is tough because it is so relentless. There is always something new to learn or some new idea to explore. It’s not a now-and-then thing. It’s an always-on, 24/7 sort of thing that you either embrace or you don’t. You can’t be a lifelong learner occasionally.

And the people who do this and take the risks and spend their life catching up on the endless list of things they don’t yet know, they will reap the rewards. And in all likelihood, they will be the ones who end up creating our future.

To quote George Bernard Shaw…

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world while the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”

I’m willing to bet that the unreasonable man of which Shaw spoke was a good example of a lifelong learner.

technorati tags:, ,

DigiKids

Here is a wonderful article by Dale Spender that I found in the Sydney Morning Herald this week.  It talks about the changes taking place in our schools and while Spender’s work has always been unashamedly pro technology for education, it’s nice to see a piece like this being printed in the mainstream media.  We certainly need to be having this discussion.

The full article can be found here, but here is a snippet..

Contrast this with the confident “digital natives” who are now the students in our schools. These are the children of the information age for whom the screen, not the page, comes first. Far from being passive recipients of existing knowledge, digi-kids have learnt by doing – by trial and error, and problem solving. It is not the right answer that they want; it is the right question they are after as they fearlessly try any of the new gadgets or applications. They are completely at ease with computers and the internet, and with accessing, creating and distributing ideas and information.

The members of the digital generation are also physically active and often noisy as they collaborate, send messages, do podcasts and wait for replies (or fan mail). The youngest of them coolly click the mouse to search out the Wiggles and solve puzzles and problems; they create new words and signs, and scan their screens seeking friends, experiences – and information.

The point is that literacy itself has changed.

Yes Dale, that is the point… that’s the point exactly.  Thanks for the article.

The Web is Us/ing Us

My apologies for the long delay between blog posts… things have been a bit upside down in my world lately as I deal with a little more change than I can comfortably get my head around.

Speaking of change, I can always rely on Karl Fisch’s blog to link me up with amazing resources that make it just so obvious why the world is changing and why our schools must start to embrace that change. The more I see of the schools I have worked in, the more I worry about just how much we don’t “get it”, and how dangerously irrelevant we are becoming to the digital generation.

This video in particular just gave me goosebumps when I saw it…