It’s All About Choices

Dsc00127I was on an international flight the other day doing a long haul across the Pacific Ocean. It was aboard a new 767 that had been fitted out with personal entertainment screens in the back of every seat. Last time I flew on this particular airline they had a single large screen that showed one movie to everyone, but on this flight I had a choice of about 20 movies, as well as music and games, all accessed by a touch screen in front of me. I watched a few movies on the flight and found it was a much better way to absorb the long flight than the previous situation of sitting through a single screening of a pre-selected movie that I probably never even wanted to see in the first place. In fact, last time I recall being on a flight with a one-size-fits-all movie screening, most people, including me, were not even watching it.

On this flight however, as you can see in the photo, there are a few important differences. Firstly, most people were watching a movie. And not the same movie mind you, but different movies. Everyone was free to make whatever movies choices they liked. The airline didn’t care what movie you watched so long as you were entertained and happy, that was all that really mattered. The engagement factor was high too… very few people were just sitting doing nothing. Unlike the idea of everyone having to watch the same thing at the same time and the subsequent disinterest level for many people, most of the passengers seemed to be watching a movie and staying engaged with the process. They watch a movie because they want to, not because they have to.

For the airline, the cost of upgrading the aircraft to provide everyone with a personal entertainment system would not have been a cheap exercise. It would certainly have been much cheaper and easier to simply retain the old system of showing one movie to everyone at the same time. Like it or lump it. Hey, you’re on the plane to get from point A to point B right? You’re not there to watch a movie! What would it matter to the airline if your boredom factor was a little high for a while? It’s not like you can walk across the Pacific instead right? So why do they do it? Why do they bother spending the extra money to build a system that keeps their passengers happy?

They do it because happy passengers are repeat passengers. They fly with you again and again. They like you. They tell their friends. They become loyal. They buy-in to what you are offering…

Observing all this got me thinking about how it might relate to education. In schools, we have traditionally had the equivalent of a single movie screening. Kids turn up to school and we serve them a syllabus based on what is easiest for the system to deliver. They all get the same content at the same time, delivered more-or-less the same way. They progress through the grades at the same pace. We don’t bother to ask them what they already know, or what interests them, or what they’d like to learn about. We just force-feed them the content that we think they ought to know at that point in their school lives, and then act all surprised when they become disengaged from the process.

We need to take the same approach the airline took. We need to realise that if we want to “keep our customers” – to get our kids to engage with the learning and to buy-in to what we are offering them – then we need to figure out how to make school a more personal, more relevant, more choice-driven experience. We have to offer ways for them to engage with content they are interested in, to allow them to work through it at their own pace, and to give them enough choice in the process so that they feel a sense of personal responsibility for that engagement. We’d like them to do the “school thing” because they want to, not because they have to.

Like the airline, it would be far easier for schools to keep showing the equivalent of one-time screenings of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. But it’s only a matter of time before our customers just refuse to fly with us because the experience is just too painful. We need to think about how we can give kids their own “personal entertainment system” experience in the classroom, giving them some choices and putting them in some sort of control over what they do.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Education, Innovation and Microsoft

DSC00120Not three words you normally find in the same sentence, but last week I had the opportunity to attend the Microsoft Education Roadshow in Sydney. It was part of the regular traveling circus that Microsoft puts on every so often to show off its commitment in the education space. I’ve been a number to these events before, but hadn’t committed to going to this one since they were usually little more than a sales wolf in educational sheeps clothing. But a few weeks prior to the event I had been asked by Intouch Consultancy if I would like to contribute some lesson plans based on the new Office 2007 applications, and those lessons would be released as part of the package of new educational content being shown at the roadshow. For that reason alone – I think it’s called ego – I decided to attend the event this year.

I’ve been a little critical of Microsoft in the past, and some of their events… you may have read my thoughts about the Vista release in Toronto last year. But I have to say, this year’s Roadshow in Sydney was really good. It makes such a difference when the speakers at an event like this are teachers, and can talk about stuff from the perspective of a teacher. I enjoyed listening to guy from the Maitland Catholic Education Office talk about their new Scholaris network deployment and how it solved a whole bunch of problems for them. I could relate to the issues he spoke about, since my school faces many of the same ones albeit on a much smaller scale. As the demos unfolded, I became more and more impressed at just how well thought through some of this new stuff is. The big problem in any school, and any network for that matter, is in getting disparate systems to talk to each other. Getting your school admin package to talk to your Active Directory server, and to talk to your payroll, your library software, your proxy server, your print management software, your timetable etc, is a pain. Getting all these systems to play nicely together is a major headache for any system admin. Yet, here was a guy showing us how they had solved all of these problems across a large number of different schools, all with slightly different configurations, all with a single sign on. I have to say I was pretty impressed… if you weren’t impressed by this, then you really didn’t understand the problem in the first place.

A guy from Intel got up to speak for a while, and it was sooooo obvious when a non-teacher addressed the crowd. the language changed from education to that of sales, and every sentence was full of corporate-speak. They really do need to keep these people away from the microphone at events like these. Seriously guys… if you invite a bunch of teachers along to an event, then keep the focus on education… we don’t care about the technical mumbo jumbo or the product specs or the projected sales figures for next quarter. That stuff is interesting to you, but not to us. Just focus on our needs and your bottom line will be just fine.

They had a guy from Microsoft show us a whole bunch of new stuff for education and I must say a lot of it looked really good. The new stuff you can do with Sharepoint was way cool, some great ideas and demos of software like Flight Simulator and Photostory, and a look at some of the new tools still in beta – in particular one for developing learning object-like apps (It’s name escapes me right now, but it looked very interesting) It looked to me like Microsoft was finally getting its act together in the education space. A final demo of Office 2007 and some new stuff for teachers by my buddy June Wall finished off the demos nicely. There was some cool stuff here too, although despite the oohs and ahhs from some of the audience at Vista’s eye candy effects, I still wouldn’t swap Vista for OSX!

I also got a chance to catch up with Margie Gardner, a teaching colleague that worked with me at Penshurst Marist. Margie took over my role when I left there and it sounds like she is doing a great job of keeping it all going. Margie and I had lunch sitting out on the steps of the Conference Centre, overlooking Darling Harbour on what was a beautiful Sydney day and had a chance to catch up on each others gossip.
Finally, back inside, we heard from the winners of the Microsoft Innovative Teachers Awards. Without intending to take anything away from these guys and girls who had been recognised as innovative teachers with technology, I have to say that it really doesn’t seem to take all that much to be “innovative”. I absolutely applaud what they have been doing with the projects and ideas that they have been applying in their classrooms, but I was stunned at how ordinary some of the “innovation” was. Margie nudged me during the demos and commented that we had been doing most of that stuff back at Penshurst more than eight years ago! I guess I just think that this sort of innovation should be seen as standard practice and not something out of the ordinary. Regardless, it was good to see people getting recognised for their work, and I hope it rubs off on some of the other teachers in the room, some of whom were perhaps seeing these ideas for collaboration and learning with technology for the first time

Before I left for the day I got to look around some of the vendor stands, had a play with the Wacom tablets, spoke to a few developers about Sharepoint, bumped into a few industry people I know and had a chat. Overall, it was a worthwhile day and I’m glad I went.

The Real World

photo-27.jpg

I’m sitting in one of our school computer labs at the moment supervising students working on the computers. We open our labs for lunchtime a few days a week so the students can use the computers, presumably to catch up on “work”.

And what do these kids – our teenage digital natives – do when the get unrestricted free access to the school computers? Just looking around the room right now and seeing what they’re up to reveals the following… more than half of them are working on their Bebo pages, a few are looking through their MySpace accounts and a couple seem to be just browsing through websites for song lyrics and anime cartoons. There are two kids checking their email, using Yahoo!Mail and Hotmail, and one is browsing through a collection of digital photos she took at the school swimming carnival last Friday.

Oh, and one had a Publisher document open that looked vaguely like it could have been a school task, but I could be wrong. It may have been a party invitation.

Is it any wonder school seems so irrelevant?